Facebook denies it collects call and SMS information from phones but permission

29 views Leave a comment

After an Ars Technica news that Facebook secretly scrapes call and calm summary information from Android phones and has finished so for years, a scandal-burdened association has responded that it usually collects that information from users who have given permission.

Facebook’s open statement, posted on a press site, comes a integrate of days after it took out full page journal ads to apologize for a injustice of information by third-party apps as it copes with fallout from a Cambridge Analytica liaison (follow a story as it develops here). In a ad, owner and arch executive officer Mark Zuckerberg wrote “We have a shortcoming to strengthen your information. If we can’t, we don’t merit it.”

The company’s response to a Ars Technica story, however, struck a opposite tone, with Facebook titling the post “Fact Check: Your Call and SMS History.” It pronounced “You might have seen some new reports that Facebook has been logging people’s call and SMS (text) story but their permission. This is not a case,” before going on to explain that call and calm story logging is enclosed with an opt-in underline on Messenger or Facebook Lite for Android that “people have to specifically determine to use” and that they can spin off during any time, that would also undo any call and calm information common with that app.

Ars Technica has already nice a strange post with a response to Facebook’s statement, observant it contradicts several of a findings, including a knowledge of users who common their information with a publication.

“In my case, a examination of my Google Play information confirms that Messenger was never commissioned on a Android inclination we used,” wrote Ars Technica IT and inhabitant confidence editor Sean Gallagher in a amendment to his post. “Facebook was  commissioned on a Nexus inscription we used and on a Blackphone 2 in 2015, and there was never an pithy summary requesting entrance to phone call and SMS data. Yet there is call information from a finish of 2015 until late 2016, when we reinstalled a handling complement on a Blackphone 2 and wiped all applications.”

In a statement, Facebook pronounced “Contact importers are sincerely common among amicable apps and services as a approach to some-more simply find a people we wish to bond with. This was initial introduced in Messenger in 2015, and after offering as an choice in Facebook Lite, a lightweight chronicle of Facebook for Android .”

When people initial pointer adult for Messenger or Facebook Lite on Android or record into Messenger on an Android device, they see a shade giving them a choice to invariably upload contacts as good as call and calm history. Facebook combined that on Messenger, users are afterwards given 3 options: to spin a underline on, “learn more” for some-more information or “not now” to skip it. On Facebook Lite, they get dual options: spin it on or skip. If users who opted in change their minds later, Facebook pronounced they could spin it off in a app’s settings, with a choice of branch off continual call and calm story logging while gripping hit uploading enabled or deletion all hit information they’ve uploaded from that app.”

An picture enclosed with Facebook’s statement.

Facebook emphasized in confidant calm that it “never sell this data, and this underline does not collect a calm of your calm messages or calls.”

Even yet a opt-in screens do state that extenuation accede will “continuously upload info” about contacts and call and calm history, it is tenable that many users don’t unequivocally know what that means and that instead of observant “this lets friends find any other on Facebook and helps us emanate a improved knowledge for everyone” (a summary honeyed with a cloying animation of a figure texting a small heart), Facebook should unequivocally be giving some-more sum about what accurately will be available and why.

With a Cambridge Analytica liaison still uninformed on everyone’s minds, Facebook’s apparent eagerness to place a responsibility for safeguarding personal information on users who already feel victimized is doubtful to assistance them recover any goodwill. But even people who truly know a implications of a underline and chose to opt-in anyway did so presumption that their information would be rhythmical as Facebook promised. As a Cambridge Analytica failure threw into pointy relief, that hasn’t always been a case.