From Aurangzeb Road to Aurangabad: Why a BJP isn’t too penetrating on a renaming game

189 views Leave a comment

Much has been pronounced about a renaming of Aurangzeb Road in Lutyens’ New Delhi to Abdul Kalam Road. And here is some more. Known in his lifetime as alamgir, ‘the victor of a world’, Aurangzeb is doubtful to spin in his grave in Khuldabad, some 30 peculiar kilometres from Aurangabad.  The Mughals had mislaid their empire, and even for a aulia-e-Hind, in that context, a detriment of a highway in Delhi, nonetheless a Mughal collateral for a prolonged time, should not means him concern.

Kalam presided over tract incomparable than Aurangzeb did, yet a latter arguably had a farthest frontiers from his capital. However, it might take an indistinct while before a new name enters popular usage. It is in central records, yet there will be letters addressed to ‘Aurangzeb Road’, unless a post bureau and a bearer companies exclude to broach them unless it is to Abdul Kalam Road.

Representational image. Mayank Austen/FlickrRepresentational image. Mayank Austen/Flickr

Representational image. Mayank Austen/Flickr

There is another indicate in a Mughal’s favour.

He did not name a road, on that Venkaiah Naidu, Union apportion lives. He says he was ‘shy’ – he might have meant ‘embarrassed’ – of it as an address. However, a city, that creatively was a village, Khadki – that was after renamed by Malik Ambar’s son to Fatehabad – was renamed Aurangabad by Aurangzeb himself. Aurangzeb was afterwards a administrator of Deccan.

Aurangzeb ruled over a Deccan from there. He did a inconceivable for any self-respecting Maharashtrian that idolises Chhatrapati Shivaji.  He put to genocide Shivaji’s son, Sambhaji. And that is since a Shiv Sena has been perfectionist that a city be renamed Sambhajinagar to continue and honour his memory. Never mind that there has been no central name change, during slightest so far, yet a party’s mouthpiece Saamana’s publishes one of a editions from Sambhajinagar, not Aurangabad.

So, since wasn’t Aurangabad singled out for renaming instead of a road, even yet it has been a Shiv Sena’s direct given a late 1990s, when it led a supervision with a BJP in Maharashtra? Regardless of a inter-party, intra-coalition tensions between a dual now, they continue to be partners, who need any other: BJP requires a Sena to sojourn in power, and a Sena needs a BJP to be means to swing power. The partnership had managed formerly to secure capitulation for Bombay’s name change to be altered to Mumbai.

It is expected that a BJP does not wish to concur any belligerent to a Sena since they are both quarrelling, notwithstanding being partners. And while a BJP wants to carve out a stronger electoral spin for itself, a Sena wants to repudiate it only that. It is degrading to be a youth partner in a state where it had led a coalition, from 1995 to 1999. In their diversion of one-upmanship, a Sena should have lifted this issue, yet its preoccupation was a beef ban.

If, and this is a large ‘if’, such an thought had entered a minds of a authorities, it was presumably quashed to safeguard that a Sena would not have a possibility to swank by holding credit for it, since Sambhajinagar is a possess egghead property. Oddly, however, a BJP has kept an arm’s length from a Abdul Kalam Road issue. Naidu has said that the thought did not come from “a Hindu, or an Indian, nor from a VHP or Bajrang Dal; yet from a non-Bharatiya… He is a Muslim… Tarek Fatah, innate in Pakistan and who is now staid in Canada and works as a journalist”.

So, in all likelihood, Aurangabad will substantially stay Aurangabad, and go on to make really small disproportion to anybody, Aurangzeb included. History will sojourn unchanged, as was a box with Mumbai where statues of British governors were unceremoniously private and junked in what was Victoria Gardens – now Jeejamata Udyan. The past stays a past. Even if we try erasing it, some vestiges will cocktail up eventually.

DNA had reported on the interesting opinion of a comparison counsel VP Patil, who was progressing a arch open prosecutor. He removed how Justice Dinshaw Mullah’s statue stays in a Mumbai High Court yet he was one of a 7 judges on a dais that sealed a sequence distinguished out Mahatma Gandhi’s name from a Roll of Barristers. The journal cited a coffee-book list on a story of a high court.

For a record, we am not in foster of renaming anything, Aurangabad included.