Gold and Silver Futures Market Prices Inconsistent With Supply and Demand Conditions

755 views Leave a comment

Supply and Demand in a Gold and Silver Futures Markets

Supply and Demand in a Gold and Silver Futures Markets

This essay establishes that a cost of bullion and china in a futures markets in that income is a accepted means of allotment is unsuitable with a conditions of supply and direct in a tangible earthy or stream marketplace where earthy bullion is bought and sole as opposite to sell in unclosed paper claims to bullion in a futures markets. The supply of bullion and china in a futures markets is augmenting by copy unclosed contracts representing claims to bullion and silver. This artificial, indeed fraudulent, boost in a supply of paper bullion and china contracts drives down a cost in a futures marketplace notwithstanding high direct for bullion in a earthy marketplace and compelled supply. We will denote with mercantile research and experimental justification that a bear marketplace in bullion and china is an synthetic creation.

The law of supply and direct is a basement of economics. Yet a cost of bullion and china in a Comex futures market, where paper contracts representing 100 troy ounces of bullion or 5,000 ounces of china are traded, is unsuitable with a tangible supply and direct conditions in a earthy marketplace for bullion. For 4 years a cost of bullion and china has been descending in a futures marketplace notwithstanding rising direct for possession of a earthy steel and supply constraints.

We start with a examination of basics. The straight pivot measures price. The plane pivot measures quantity. Demand curves slope down to a right, a apportion demanded augmenting as cost falls. Supply curves slope ceiling to a right, a apportion granted rising with price. The intersection of supply with direct determines price. (Graph 1)

Supply and Demand Graph 1

A change in quantity demanded or in a quantity supplied refers to a transformation along a given curve. A change in direct or a change in supply refers to a change in a curves. For example, an boost in direct (a change to a right of a direct curve) causes a transformation along a supply bend (an boost in a apportion supplied).

Changes in income and changes in tastes or preferences toward an object can means a direct bend to shift. For example, if people design that their fiat banking is going to remove value, a direct for bullion and china would boost (a change to a right).

Changes in record and resources can means a supply bend to shift. New bullion discoveries and improvements in bullion mining record would means a supply bend to change to a right. Exhaustion of existent mines would means a rebate in supply (a change to a left).

What can means a cost of bullion to fall? Two things: The direct for bullion can fall, that is, a direct bend could change to a left, intersecting a supply bend during a reduce price. The tumble in direct formula in a rebate in a apportion supplied. A tumble in direct means that people wish reduction bullion during each price. (Graph 2)

Supply and Demand Graph 2

Alternatively, supply could increase, that is, a supply bend could change to a right, intersecting a direct bend during a reduce price. The boost in supply formula in an boost in a apportion demanded. An boost in supply means that some-more bullion is accessible during each price. (Graph 3)

Supply and Demand Graph 3

To summarize: a decrease in a cost of bullion can be caused by a decrease in a direct for bullion or by an boost in a supply of gold.

A decrease in direct or an boost in supply is not what we are watching in a bullion and china earthy markets. The cost of bullion in a futures marketplace has been descending as direct for earthy bullion increases and supply practice constraints What we are saying in a earthy marketplace indicates a rising price. Yet in a futures marketplace in that roughly all contracts are staid in income and not with bullion deliveries, a cost is falling.

For example, on Jul 7, 2015, a U.S. Mint pronounced that due to a “significant” boost in demand, it had sole out of Silver Eagles (one unit china coin) and was suspending sales until some time in August. The premiums on a coins (the cost of a china above a cost of a silver) rose, though a mark cost of china fell 7 percent to a lowest turn of a year (as of Jul 7).

This is a second time in 9 months that a U.S. Mint could not keep adult with marketplace direct and had to postpone sales. During a initial 5 months of 2015, a U.S. Mint had to allotment sales of Silver Eagles. According to Reuters, given 2013 a U.S. Mint has had to allotment china china sales for 18 months. In 2013 a Royal Canadian Mint announced a rationing of a Silver Maple Leaf coins: “We are delicately handling supply in a face of really high demand. . . . Coming off clever sales volumes in Dec 2012, direct to date stays really clever for a Silver Maple Leaf and Gold Maple Leaf bullion coins.” During this whole duration when mints could not keep adult with direct for coins, a cost of china consistently fell on a Comex futures market. On Jul 24, 2015 a cost of bullion in a futures marketplace fell to a lowest turn in 5 years notwithstanding an boost in a direct for bullion in a earthy market. On that day U.S. Mint sales of Gold Eagles (one unit bullion coin) were a top in some-more than dual years, nonetheless a cost of bullion fell in a futures market.

How can this be explained? The financial press says that a dump in changed metals prices unleashed a swell in tellurian direct for coins. This reason is foolish to an economist. Price is not a determinant of direct though of apportion demanded. A reduce cost does not change a direct curve. Moreover, if direct increases, cost goes up, not down.

Perhaps what a financial press means is that a reduce cost resulted in an boost in a apportion demanded. If so, what caused a reduce price? In mercantile analysis, a answer would have to be an boost in supply, possibly new haven from new discoveries and new mines or mining record advances that reduce a cost of producing bullion.

There are no reports of any such supply augmenting developments. To a contrary, a reduce prices of bullion have been causing reductions in mining outlay as descending prices make existent operations unprofitable.

There are abounding other signs of high direct for bullion, nonetheless a prices continue their four-year decrease on a Comex. Even as vast unclosed shorts (sales of bullion contracts that are not lonesome by earthy bullion) on a bullion futures marketplace are pushing down price, clever direct for earthy bullion has been exhausting a land of GLD, a largest sell traded bullion fund. Since Feb 27, 2015, a certified bullion banks (principally JPMorganChase, HSBC, and Scotia) have private 10 percent of GLD’s bullion holdings. Similarly, clever direct in China and India has resulted in a 19% boost of purchases from a Shanghai Gold Exchange, a earthy bullion market, during a initial entertain of 2015. Through a week finale Jul 10, 2015, purchases from a Shanghai Gold Exchange alone are occurring during an annualized rate approximately equal to a annual supply of tellurian mining output.

India’s china imports for a initial 4 months of 2015 are 30% aloft than 2014. In a initial entertain of 2015 Canadian Silver Maple Leaf sales augmenting 8.5% compared to sales for a same duration of 2014. Sales of Gold Eagles in June, 2015, were some-more than triple a sales for May. During a initial 10 days of July, Gold Eagles sales were 2.5 times larger than during a initial 10 days of June.

Clearly a direct for earthy steel is really high, and a ability to accommodate this direct is constrained. Yet, a prices of bullion in a futures marketplace have consistently depressed during this whole period. The usually probable reason is manipulation.

Precious steel prices are dynamic in a futures market, where paper contracts representing bullion are staid in cash, not in markets where a tangible metals are bought and sold. As a Comex is primarily a income allotment market, there is small risk in unclosed contracts (an unclosed agreement is a guarantee to broach bullion that a seller of a agreement does not possess). This means that it is easy to boost a supply of bullion in a futures marketplace where cost is dynamic simply by copy unclosed (naked) contracts. Selling exposed shorts is a approach to artificially boost a supply of bullion in a futures marketplace where cost is determined. The supply of paper contracts representing bullion increases, though not a supply of earthy bullion.

As we have documented on a series of occasions, a prices of bullion are being evenly driven down by a remarkable coming and sale during thinly traded times of day and night of unclosed destiny contracts representing vast amounts of bullion. In a space of a few mins or reduction vast amounts of bullion and china shorts are dumped into a Comex market, dramatically augmenting a supply of paper claims to bullion. If purchasers of these shorts stood for delivery, a Comex would fail. Comex bullion and china futures are used for conjecture and by sidestep supports to conduct a risk/return characteristics of metrics like a Sharpe Ratio. The sidestep supports are endangered with indexing a cost of bullion and china and not with a rate of lapse opening of their bullion contracts.

A receptive swindler faced with clever direct for bullion and compelled supply would not brief a market. Moreover, no receptive actor who wished to tell a vast bullion position would dump a entirety of his position on a marketplace all during once. What afterwards explains a vast exposed shorts that are hurled into a marketplace during thinly traded times?

The bullion banks are a primary market-makers in bullion futures. they are also clearing members of a Comex, that gives them entrance to information such as a positions of a sidestep supports and a prices during that stop-loss orders are triggered. They time their sales of unclosed shorts to trigger stop-loss sales and afterwards cover their brief sales by purchasing contracts during a cost that they have forced down, pocketing a increase from a manipulation

The bullion and china strategy is obvious. The doubt is because do a authorities endure it?

Perhaps a answer is that a giveaway bullion marketplace serves both to strengthen opposite a detriment of a fiat currency’s purchasing energy from sell rate decrease and acceleration and as a warning that destabilizing systemic events are on a horizon. The stream turn of persisting vast brief sales dense into a few mins during thinly traded durations began after bullion strike $1,900 per unit in response to a rave of uneasy debt and a Federal Reserve’s process of Quantitative Easing. Washington’s energy is heavily contingent on a purpose of a dollar as universe haven currency. The rising dollar cost of bullion indicated rising annoy with a dollar. Whereas a dollar’s sell value is delicately managed with assistance from a Japanese and European executive banks, a supply of such assistance is not unlimited. If bullion kept relocating up, sell rate debility was expected to uncover adult in a dollar, so forcing a Fed off a process of regulating QE to rescue a “banks too vast to fail.”

The bullion banks’ conflict on bullion is being protracted with a spate of stories in a financial media denying any utility of gold. On Jul 17 a Wall Street Journal announced that probity about bullion requires approval that bullion is zero though a pet rock. Other commentators announce bullion to be in a bear marketplace notwithstanding a clever direct for earthy steel and supply constraints, and some successful celebration is dynamic that bullion not be regarded as money.

Why a remarkable spate of claims that bullion is not money? Gold is deliberate a partial of a United States’ executive financial reserves, that is also a box for executive banks and a IMF. The IMF accepts bullion as amends for credit extended. The US Treasury’s Office of a Comptroller of a Currency classifies bullion as a currency, as can be seen in a OCC’s latest quarterly news on bank derivatives activities in that a OCC places bullion futures in a unfamiliar sell derivatives classification.

The strategy of a bullion cost by injecting vast quantities of creatively printed unclosed contracts into a Comex marketplace is an experimental fact. The remarkable debunking of bullion in a financial press is inconclusive justification that a full-scale conflict on gold’s duty as a systemic warning vigilance is underway.

It is doubtful that regulatory authorities are unknowingly of a fake strategy of bullion and china prices. The fact that zero is finished about it is an denote of a anarchy that prevails in US financial markets.



Courtesy: Paul Craig Roberts  Dave Kranzler

tag cloud

Comex Gold and Silver Futures Market , Gold and Silver Bear Market , Gold and Silver Manipulation , Gold and Silver Prices , Gold and Silver Shorts , Gold Eagles , Gold Maple Leaf Coins , Paper Gold and Silver Contracts , Physical Bullion Market , Price of Gold And Silver , Silver Eagles , Silver Maple Leaf coins , Supply and Demand Conditions