Intensity of U.S. appetite use in production decreases as outlay outpaces fuel use

107 views Leave a comment

The appetite power of U.S. production has continued to decrease, according to a latest information from EIA’s Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey (MECS). From 2010 to 2014, production fuel expenditure increasing by 4.7%, while genuine sum outlay increasing by 9.6%—or some-more than twice that rate—resulting in a 4.4% diminution in appetite intensity.

Image credit: U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Like EIA’s expenditure surveys of the residential and commercial sectors, MECS is conducted on a periodic basis. The latest MECS recover provides production appetite consumption, appetite expenditures, and other energy-related metrics formed on information collected in 2015, that reflects activity in 2014. The U.S. Energy Information Administration has conducted a MECS consult 8 times given a initial MECS consult in 1985. The 2014 MECS representation distance of approximately 15,000 establishments was drawn from a representation support representing 97% to 98% of a inhabitant production payroll.

Although many production establishments are holding stairs to revoke their appetite consumption, a appetite power diminution for sum production is mostly a outcome of a change of production outlay from energy-intensive industries, such as a make of metals, chemicals, paper, and petroleum and spark products, to reduction energy-intensive industries. If vital industries had confirmed a same proportions of a production sector, a appetite power decrease between 2010 and 2014 would have been 0.7% instead of 4.4%.

One of a fastest flourishing industries between 2010 and 2014 was travel apparatus manufacturing, an attention with comparatively low appetite intensity. Gross outlay in travel apparatus production grew 30.8% over that period, most faster than a 9.6% boost in altogether production outlay between 2010 and 2014.

Image credit: U.S. Energy Information Administration.

While outlay and expenditure rose, production practice decreased from 2010 to 2014, agreeable an boost in labor productivity. Manufacturing processes continue to evolve, incorporating more electronic and robotic devices, that might be a primary cause in increased labor productivity.

Total appetite in production includes both fuel and nonfuel uses, such as when healthy gas is used as a feedstock for chemical manufacturing. Considering fuel use only, healthy gas done adult a incomparable share of production use, while fuels such as spark and coke, fuel oil, and other petroleum liquids done adult smaller shares. Natural gas expenditure for production was 5.9 quadrillion British thermal units (Btu) in 2014, or 39% of a sum fuel use in manufacturing, compared with 37% in 2010.

Image credit: U.S. Energy Information Administration.

On an mercantile basis, healthy gas has turn some-more cost rival with spark and requires lower expendituresper section of appetite than fuel oil or liquefied petroleum gases.

Source: EIA

Comment this news or article