Money was siphoned off to Sheena’s bank account: CBI tells justice as Peter Mukerjea’s control extended to 30 Nov

199 views Leave a comment

Mumbai: A special justice in Mumbai on Thursday extended compartment 30 Nov a CBI control of former media nobleman Peter Mukerjea, one of a 4 primary indicted in a marvellous Sheena Bora murder case, as investigators zeroed in on financial matters as a ground behind a killing.

Peter was presented before a CBI justice on Thursday afternoon after he was brought behind from New Delhi, where he was taken for review by a group 3 days ago.

Peter Mukerjea. PTIPeter Mukerjea. PTI

Peter Mukerjea. PTI

The charge requested for additional control of Peter as they wanted to examine a income angle and also lift out a polygraph (lie detector) exam on him.

Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh pronounced a CBI has created to Interpol seeking a assistance for removing entrance to unfamiliar bank accounts of a Mukerjea family members.

He sensitive a justice that income was siphoned off from a INX company, in that a Mukerjea integrate (Peter and Indrani) were partners, and routed to Sheena’s HSBC comment in Singapore.

In this connection, a lady named Gayatri Ahuja, operative in DBS Bank in Singapore, had helped Indrani open a comment during a HSBC Bank there.

Peter has also sensitive a CBI sleuths that other accounts might have been non-stop in Sheena’s name by Indrani in HSBC and other banks in Singapore and Hong Kong.

The CBI contends that a Mukerjeas’ company, 9X Media Pvt Ltd, had conducted an inner review of a 9 companies in Mar 2009 and found estimable amounts of income siphoned off and wasted by a twin (Peter-Indrani), that was substantiated by reports of a Income Tax department, Serious Fraud review Office and a franchised accountants.

In a associated development, Peter’s brother, Goa-based publisher Gautam Mukerjea, requested “the right of remoteness for a family that has been repelled by Peter’s detain and going by perplexing times”.

“We trust that a media recognises that this matter concerns a privacy, repute and picture of a self-made and reputable particular and his family that has already suffered mishap in this case,” Gautam pronounced in a media matter on Thursday.

“The whole family is assured of Peter’s ignorance and we are in no doubt that due routine will eventually exhibit this.”

“It would be best during this time that a agencies are authorised to control their work in an unhampered manner, but insane conclusions being arrived during in a halt duration by any party,” Gautam added.

Urging a media to honour their remoteness while stating on a matter, Gautam said: “We also feel that uncontrollable conjecture in a media about Peter’s blame detached from being hurtful is counter-productive to a well-spoken and satisfactory review and trial.”

Peter, 59, was arrested on Nov 19 from his home in Mumbai’s Worli area and has been in CBI control given then.

Among other things, a CBI contends that Peter was wakeful of a murdering of Sheena, a daughter of his mother Indrani Mukerjea.

In August, Mumbai military had arrested Indrani, her ex-husband Sanjeev Khanna and her former motorist Shyamwar Rai in tie with a murder.

The contingent of Indrani, Khanna and Rai is in CBI control compartment 3 December.