An hearing of millions of systematic papers and patents reveals works that land in a tip 5 percent of a many cited investigate pull on a brew of aged and new knowledge—significant in a day and age when a series of new publications is augmenting dramatically, says a researcher during a University of Michigan.
Daniel Romero, partner highbrow during a U-M School of Information, and colleagues from Northwestern University analyzed some-more than 28.4 million systematic papers in a Web of Science and scarcely 5.4 million U.S. patents to establish that works were cited a many and why. They found what they referred to as a hotspot in that researchers doubled their possibility of being cited.
This hotspot occurred when a investigate used a low meant age and high age variance, in other difference when it enclosed a latest information accessible in multiple with some tried-and-true investigate from a past.
“It is healthy for scientists to ride towards renouned and ‘hot’ investigate topics and ideas,” Romero said. “While focusing on elucidate new problems and being wakeful of a state-of-the-art is essential to make impact, we find that this is usually half of a story. Old and determined believe is also critical and should be partial of a meditative when we do research.”
The authors note a immeasurable acceleration in a prolongation of new believe and a bent for researchers to consider newer is better. On a Web of Science, 1.5 million new articles were published in 2014 alone, sextupling given 1970, while a U.S. released 287,831 patents in 2013, quadruple a series in 1970.
The researchers found these patterns to be loyal opposite scholarship and record fields. They also found that investigate involving collaborations was some-more expected to land in a hotspot than a work finished by a solo researcher, that they contend is not startling given a group is expected to move broader, some-more different believe to a problem than one individual.
“Our formula have stress to a proceed researchers proceed a hunt for ideas to pull on when they delineate their research,” Romero pronounced “Our formula also have implications for educational hunt engines. Search engines could take a commentary into comment when building ranking algorithms to equivocate over-ranking new works and providing users a healthy reduction of new and aged papers.”
Source: University of Michigan
Comment this news or article