Shiv Sena money in on beef ban, fries BJP with powerful protests

259 views Leave a comment

Mumbai: As we wait for a final attestation of a Bombay High Court outcome on a beef anathema during a Parayushan, there are a few points to gnaw on.

One, it was initial introduced in Mumbai in 1964 by a city county physique on warning by Jains. The mayor in that year was EA Bandookwala, a Bohri Muslim. The petition to him had cited how Akbar, a Mughal czar had bent to a attraction of a adherents to Jainism.

Caught in a domestic plate. AFPCaught in a domestic plate. AFP

Caught in a domestic plate. AFP

Two, a anathema opposite a state of Maharashtra has been in place given 2004 when conjunction a BJP, nor a Shiv Sena was in power. It was a Congress and a Nationalist Congress Party, that had as most a suit of meat-eaters as those who conflict a anathema now.

Three, a Mumbai county body’s extended anathema that enclosed 17 September, was anyhow a meatless day — no massacre house, no sell sale of beef — given of Ganpati festival. The cold sequence by a city commissioner did not discuss this. The Mumbai Municipal Corporation wanted a anathema to be imposed each year, as forked out. It was not as a Shiv Sena done it out, a remarkable shaft from a blue.

But before pulling serve into this emanate of Shiv Sena’s and a breakaway party, Raj Thackeray’s Maharashtra Navnirman Sena’s on-the-street proceed on a ban, suppose what would have happened had a Muslims been as strident on a beef anathema in force given this year. Only carabeef (buffalo meat) is allowed; a new law prohibits massacre of not usually cows though bulls too.

In a malediction opposite a Jain community, Shiv Sena’s mouthpiece, Saamana had asked them not to be “religious fanatics” like Muslims. Imagine if they had massacre or sole beef on a streets of Mumbai as a symbol of protest. Despite a good Muslim, bad Muslim distinction, a Shiv Sena can frequency be called accessible to them to have eaten such a protest. They elite a courts instead.

The anathema on massacre of bulls was a handiwork of a Shiv Sena-BJP led supervision in 1995-96 and a Bill authorized by a legislature had lain unattended by a unbroken presidents compartment Pranab Mukherjee gave his agree — as all laws are compulsory to be — when a benefaction BJP-led supervision came to power. Muslims have not said, “Don’t enter a kitchens” like Sena has told a Jains.

The irony is a beef anathema came from a county physique tranquil by a Shiv Sena. Apparently, it chose to take to a streets before it chose to pierce a fortitude in a county physique seeking nullification of a Commissioner’s notification.

Not surprisingly they strike a streets with a domestic ground as a Shiv Sena and also a MNS wanted to connect their possess opinion banks. The Jains are seen as BJP opinion bank. Telling them off that their sensitivities during an critical eremite duration concerning them did not matter to a city was one way. The Jains were told all sorts of things like that a Sena, that stable them during a 1992-93 riots, was able of destroying their businesses. Moreover, that their businesses were not moral; they dealt in black money.

  • Mumbai beef anathema turns political: Shiv Sena and MNS sell beef on a street

    Mumbai beef anathema turns political: Shiv Sena and MNS sell beef on a street

  • Now, Chhattisgarh bans sale of beef during Paryushan, Ganesh Chaturthi

    Now, Chhattisgarh bans sale of beef during Paryushan, Ganesh Chaturthi

  • Political quarrel erupts over beef anathema as Shiv Sena, Cong conflict BMC decision

    Political quarrel erupts over beef anathema as Shiv Sena, Cong conflict BMC decision

If we know Marathi, review a editorial in Saamana of 10 September. Saamana editorials are generally quoted as not usually a celebration perspective though also Uddhav Thackeray’s. He has never pronounced that it not be ascribed to him. He told a Jains not to “enter a kitchens”. Strong difference in an editorial that was headlined, “Jains, don’t go a Muslim way” (translation). MNS went in another instruction – Jains had no business to tell Maharashtra that approach to go. Gujarat was their place.

Comparing Jains to a Muslim village was rather peculiar given it done a evidence strident and during slightest verbally extended a threat. The Sena is unchanging in a claims that it saved a city and a Hindus from Muslims. It has never downplayed this stance.

The Maharashtra supervision has been left thrashing about but an shun route, and a predestine of a BJP MLAs who lobbied for a anathema have been no different. The Sena, that has outsmarted a BJP for lacking in refinement and decisiveness, and by winning over a meat-eaters, seems to consider it has strengthened a opinion bank for a subsequent county elections. Please note a anathema on beef as per a state supervision presentation is not singular to Mumbai. Curiously enough, not a sigh has been listened from anywhere else in a state.