Silicon Valley will be shouting during anti-Modi ‘moral advisory’ by academics

671 views Leave a comment

By Madhu Purnima Kishwar

Even if Narendra Modi doesn’t do any other good as primary apportion of India, he has finished one ancestral grant to politics: he has unprotected a hollowness, pomposity and perfect dishonesty of what masquerades as secularism and tellurian rights activism with courtesy to India.

Recently a dignified advisory has been released by a organisation of US academics to Silicon Valley professionals that they should critique India as an investment finish given a stream primary apportion is allegedly a sinister male and is “almost certainly” going to injustice information record for espionage on a adults (see full content of strange minute here).

To quote a advisory in a possess words, “As it stands, ‘Digital India’ seems to omit pivotal questions lifted in India by critics involved about a collection of personal information and a nearby certainty that such digital systems will be used to raise notice and restrain a constitutionally stable rights of a citizens.”

In a democracy everybody has a right to criticise, conflict and even loathing politicians whose actions are out of sync with their expectations. Modi positively deserves critique on several counts. we myself have critiqued several acts of elect and repudiation of a Modi government. These academics are also acquire to critique or even arrangement open feeling to Modi supposing they don’t crush contribution and cover-up their loathing of a male as counterclaim of “academic freedom” and “civil liberties.”

Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Dubai. PTIPrime Minister Narendra Modi in Dubai. PTI

Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Dubai. PTI

Several signatories to this absurd interest are my friends. Some of them have hosted my lectures in a US and offering me comfortable hospitality. Some of them have even contributed judicious articles to Manushi, a biography we edited. Knowing them well, we can usually contend that they seem to have sealed this absurd interest underneath counterpart pressure, nonetheless requesting vicious suspicion that is approaching of academics in premier universities. To my aged friends in this group, we can usually interest that they should do a existence check before they commence domestic interventions where they finish adult being used by vested interests with divergent agendas. The rest of my retort is addressed to those who have finished a sacrament out of nursing mortal animosity towards Modi and BJP during a insistence of vested interests.

It is notable that there is not a singular scientist, engineer, counsel or IT veteran in this list of signatories. This campaign, and several other anti-Modi ones, have roughly always come from a domain of feminist studies and a departments of South Asian studies that have been evenly nurtured by a US investiture to multiply anti-India promotion underneath a guise of support tellurian rights and amicable justice. It is in a domain of scholarship and record that Indians have excelled and emerged winners in open foe with their American colleagues. Their attribute with India is distant some-more constructive than that of academics employed in a ghettos of South Asian studies.

The Emperor has no clothes: It is tough to trust that this schooled expertise does not know that they their possess “Emperor has no clothes”. Residing in a US and bankrolled by a agencies or institutions, these “neo-Anglo-Saxons” select to forget that a US and Britain have been regulating a homogeneous of a worldwide military state for a past several decades, where roughly any phone call or communication could be tapped by their comprehension agencies.

As forked out by Prof K Gopinath of a Indian Institute of Science in Bangalore, “the Silicon Valley honchos they interest to have pioneered large technologies that are customarily used for descent and defensive comprehension operations. They petition technologists and businessmen in Silicon Valley to be heedful of remoteness violations (only in India?) when, for many of them, it is partial of their daily bread and butter! As one of their clan announced in 1999 (Scott McNealy, former CEO of Sun Microsystems), “You have 0 remoteness anyway. Get over it.”

“Note that this quote relates to US citizens; it goes nonetheless observant that non-US adults are totally during a forgiveness of US/British agencies nonetheless any recourse! Microsoft, ATT, Yahoo, Google and other companies have customarily assisted (under duress/subpeona sometimes) “US inhabitant confidence operations”. Many Silicon Valley companies have actively sought out business among obvious strict regimes. A obvious video-calling product, Skype, nonetheless approved by a heading cryptographer as being secure, was suggested to have a backdoor that supposing a Chinese authorities entrance to each review in genuine time with roughly no effort. If they had dared happen with American investors going to China or even Pakistan or Saudi Arabia, they would have been asked to go see a cringe and positively ruled out of tenured jobs!

“Have these worthies already mislaid a National Security Agency (NSA) personal information leaked in 2013 by Edward Snowden, a former CIA worker and supervision contractor? These leaks suggested countless tellurian notice programmes, many run by a NSA and a Five Eyes with a team-work of telecommunication companies and European governments. Any unprejudiced spectator can see how steadfastly (across 6 decades or more) a US, Britain and Europe have been holding a rest of a universe for a privacy/security float with a active partnership of Silicon Valley.”

Though their divine interest is firm to be laughed during by Silicon Valley, it can’t be abandoned given it seems to have been desirous by vested interests who wish to keep India mired in poverty, foster struggle among a people, and keep it exposed to apprehension attacks.

Witch-hunting underneath a guise of piety: This sect of Modi baiters reminds Silicon Valley entrepreneurs of their dignified “responsibilities and obligations” nonetheless seems to be preoccupied to their possess “responsibilities and obligations” as academics, where they are approaching to rest on contribution rather than make demonology around a personality whose recognition they can't stomach. So blinded are they by their malignant influence that they can’t tell a disproportion between hating Modi and spiteful India. By office on a tellurian village to go for an mercantile critique of India and announce it an apartheid state simply given of their loathing of one man, they have some-more expected been behaving as pawns – some of them intentionally and others unwittingly – in a hands of army antagonistic to India. The investments that come to India are by no means going to Modi’s pocket.

This is not a initial time American academics have crossed a Lakshman Rekha that divides honest, well-meaning critique from witch-hunting for ideological reasons. They, along with their collaborators in Indian academia, had launched a identical debate in 2005 addressed to a US supervision perfectionist that Modi be denied a US visa because they, not a Indian courts, cruise him guilty of “masterminding” a electrocute of Muslims in Gujarat in 2002. The fact that they launched this debate 3 years after a riots and usually after a Sonia Gandhi-headed Congress came to energy indicates whose diversion they were playing, and whose interests they were serving.

Since a interest had a subsidy of well-entrenched hardcore devout groups in a US who loathing a BJP for antagonistic acclimatisation drives in India, a US supervision straightforwardly thankful and announced a anathema on Modi’s entrance from 2005 and compartment he became primary apportion in 2014. They wouldn’t even let him residence a video-conference when invited by American universities or NRIs. It is notable that not a singular FIR had been purebred opposite Modi during that time (or even compartment date), and no military hire or justice had purebred any box opposite him. And nonetheless a US academics began a McCarthy form witch-hunt opposite a popularly inaugurated arch apportion for a elementary reason that vested interests in a US and India had unsuccessful to better Modi politically. They, therefore, began regulating plainly rebellious means to chase him from power.

It is apropos increasingly pure that a US investiture is worried with a arise of Modi and a BJP to power. Otherwise such loathing campaigns would not have regularly emanated from American campuses. A infancy of these academics are of Indian start nonetheless a smarts behind a whole pierce are positively white American. Rabid devout organisations are subsidy and appropriation anti-BJP assault given they find that, distinct a Congress Party, a BJP is reluctant to open adult India for large-scale conversions to Christianity.

Absurd charges opposite Modi: The academics’ explain that Digital India is a Modi swindling for citizen surveillance, nonetheless are they so divided from existence that they are unknowingly that digitisation pre-dates Modi’s arrogance of energy as PM?

Digitisation is a sorcery wand that can assistance renovate a face of governance in India, by creation it pure and some-more accountable. It is a usually approach a administration can broach fit and rapid services and gratification measures to citizens. The e-governance mantra has been adopted by all vital domestic parties in India due to clever vigour from adults to pierce in that direction. India has already mislaid changed time and depressed behind a rest of a universe given revolutionary trade unions blocked computerisation for scarcely dual decades. But now nobody in India is peaceful to creek delays and deterrent in this regard.

Yes, some of these technologies are firm to be used for surveillance, including crime detection, notice of hawala networks, monitoring apprehension networks and beefing adult limit security. But no one is angry in India given people realize that India is among a many involved countries in a world, interjection to a set-back of carrying Pakistan as a next-door neighbour, whose self-declared process is draining India to genocide by a thousand cuts! If these academics are honestly worried about a injustice of digital technologies for violating citizens’ right to privacy, let them initial convince a US to idle a tellurian snooping systems. They rest of a world, including India, will gladly follow a example.

Incompetents in pivotal posts: The academics also accuse a Modi supervision for appointing amateurish people in pivotal jobs. It is notable that they can't move some-more than 3 cases. In each

Prime Minister Narendra Modi during Madison Square Garden. PTI imagePrime Minister Narendra Modi during Madison Square Garden. PTI image

Prime Minister Narendra Modi during Madison Square Garden. PTI image

of these 3 cases, a Modi supervision has indeed selected really amateurish persons to conduct those institutions. But a list does not stop during these three. Many of us are perturbed that a Modi supervision has authorised too many incompetents and effect mongers allocated by a Congress regime to possibly continue in pivotal jobs or even be towering to aloft posts. These are distant some-more vivid examples given they engage officers who were dynamic cronies of a Congress Party and nonetheless managed to get clientele even underneath a stream regime. But such people don’t annoy a signatories of this ridiculous interest given they are “secular crooks.”

I am certain there are copiousness of such controversial appointments even in American universities. Did people stop investing in a US on that account? The merits of an appointment underneath any and each regime, in each republic of a world, are mostly questioned and even challenged. This has happened during all regimes in India. But is it their box that before investing in India (and no other country) American investors contingency scrutinize all supervision appointments as per a norms set by these self-appointed guardians of educational excellence?

Most vicious of all, those critiquing a Modi government’s appointments should remember that zero of them can kick a unsuitability of Gopa Sabharwal’s anointment as Vice Chancellor of Nalanda University by zero other than a princely Amartya Sen – who is good famous to be a egghead godfather of this educational gang. Gajendra Chauhan is no doubt a bad choice to conduct a FTII, nonetheless Sabharwal is by all accounts even reduction estimable of a office she was handpicked for in defilement of rules, regulations and subordinate criteria. In fact, Sen himself might have been a distinguished economist, nonetheless he has warranted a lot of indignity by treating Nalanda as a personal fief, regulating a affairs by remote control and with tiny accountability. (Read some of a sum here).

Sen’s mismanagement of a affairs of Nalanda caused former President APJ Abdul Kalam, who was a primary inciter behind this project, to publicly disjoin himself from it. Sen went around angry about “political division in educational institutions” usually given a NDA supervision did not replenish his power in bureau when his reign finished in Jul 2015. In fact, Amartya Sen landed this prestigious office usually given of nepotism, as he is a personal crony of Manmohan Singh and a heading courtier in Sonia Gandhi’s durbar.

The law of a matter is that a tiny sect of revolutionary intellectuals and academics have been authorised sum corner on cherished institutions, and have so come to design such jobs as their birth right. Whenever this corner has been questioned or touched, they arise in snub and make life ruin for whichever regime dares move in a opposite set of people. Eminent academics, artists and intellectuals whose certification are widely reputable have been hounded out of their jobs if they do not have a stamp of capitulation of this intellectually authoritarian coterie. Anyone who dares tumble out of line with their agendas and ideological prisms has their careers injured for life.

As distant as their assign of supervision division in educational institutions is concerned, we wish a Indian signatories to this naïve petition had stayed on in India and launched a dynamic debate to giveaway educational institutions from statist controls that were institutionalised when regimes of their choice were in power! Have they mislaid that underneath CPM order in West Bengal, leave alone a professor’s job, one could not get even a peon’s office nonetheless being a card-carrying member of a Communist party? But given these academics chose greener pastures for themselves, let them not rubbish their changed efforts fretting about a contemptible predestine of a educational institutions, for a debase began with a Congress party, that ruled India for over 5 decades. The Congress institutionalised a thought of domestic division in institutions. They can rest certain that many of us in India are committed to changing a manners of a diversion in foster of educational leisure – a assign these worthies unsuccessful to commence when they had a possibility to do so

NDA crackdown on some NGOs: The matter in their letter, that Modi’s initial year in bureau has meant “bans and restrictions on NGOs” is product of paranoia. They are good wolf simply given same of their allies among US-funded NGOs have been released notices to explain since year after year they have intentionally avoided filing audited accounts for a large supports they perceived from western donor agencies, so violating income-tax laws and FCRA regulations.

A handful of NGOs have had their FCRA registrations cancelled following enquiries that yielded plain documentary justification of sum corruption, including siphoning of supports to personal accounts, as good as spending income for functions that were opposite from a ones creatively stated. The many scandalous box is that of a Mumbai-based NGO, whose founders Teesta Setalvad and Javed Anand, are good favourites with this clique. These celebrities have been indicted of regulating crores of rupees from a comment collected in a names of a victims of a 2002 Gujarat riots. Teesta and her family allegedly used a income for purchasing personal luxuries, beauty treatments, wine, branded clothes, feasts and unfamiliar travel. It is notable that a review into Teesta’s misdemeanors began usually after a involved demonstration victims filed a military censure alleging rascal and misappropriation opposite this NGO. And nonetheless they are being treated as victims of Modi’s wrath!

Is it their box that their lucky NGOs are above a law of a land? Don’t they know how people indicted of rascal and non-compliance would have been treated in a US? Yes, Greenpeace has been deprived of FCRA registration. But inauspicious reports were filed by a Intelligence Bureau opposite this general NGO underneath a “secular” UPA regime. In any case, termination of FCRA registration usually means it can't accept unfamiliar supports for a domestic activism. It is giveaway to lift on a promotion and advocacy campaigns with locally lifted resources, as lakhs of NGOs in India do. The FCRA law enacted underneath a Congress regime mandates that domestic activity can't be carried out with unfamiliar funds. Even domestic parties are criminialized from doing so. In such a situation, if NGOs indulge in domestic campaigns for or opposite this or that celebration regulating unfamiliar funds, it can't by any widen of imagination be treated as a crackdown on dissent. There is no bar on their activism, supposing they reside by a country’s laws like a others. No self-respecting republic can concede a politics and economy to be hold to release by a sect of organisations propped adult by unfamiliar powers, generally those that have a story of harming India’s interests.

As for a assign that Modi’s regime has brought in nuisance and censorship of opinions vicious to his government, even a infrequent peek during a newspapers, magazines, TV debates, news programmes and educational papers would uncover that Modi is underneath a harshest probable open inspection by both media and academia. Some of a criticisms leveled opposite Modi are good deserved nonetheless a good partial of it is malicious. Not a singular publisher or educational can explain to have suffered on comment of Modi bashing. There is usually one chairman in a Modi supervision who a media chooses not to criticize given he has been their desired one for many prolonged years – many before Modi came to a inhabitant scene. The rest in BJP, including Modi, are easy prey!

Then there is a assign of defilement of “religious freedom” underneath a BJP government. This is zero nonetheless a sinister approach of portrayal India as a brute republic where eremite minorities, definition Christians and Muslims, are underneath grave hazard and being perpetually massacred. They have mastered a Goebbelsian technique of forever repeating lies with vehemence compartment they acquire a force of truth.

This postulated promotion has put India on tip of a hit-list of jihadi terrorists and combined influence and fear among tellurian investors. They are so endangering India by creation Islamic apprehension groups feel fit in executing explosve blasts and other ruthless attacks in India. Many among this estimable list had sealed identical appeals to Indian electorate to forestall Modi from apropos PM, alleging that underneath his power India would be engulfed by community riots and rivers of blood would flow. They are angry that zero of a arrange has happened. Therefore, they are reduced to sum deceit and undisguised lies by presenting half a dozen teenager cases of burglary or desolation of some churches by internal hoodlums as explanation of a NDA’s anti-minority policy. As per military records, in a same period, over 258 cases of burglary and desolation took place in Hindu temples of Delhi, nonetheless evoking any assault among Hindus or disproportion of magnetism from a votaries of “religious freedom.”

Whatever be their other faults (and a BJP has many), zero of a BJP-ruled states – be it Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan or Chhattisgarh – has witnessed community riots that became a hallmark of Congress regimes. Even Gujarat, that was a many riot-prone state during Congress rule, became totally riot-free for 12 years after Modi accepted and brought underneath control a army that had instigated a 2002 killings. Since Modi became PM, community riots have taken place in states ruled by “secular parties” such as a Samajwadi Party in UP and a Congress Party in Manipur and Assam.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Canada. ReutersPrime Minister Narendra Modi in Canada. Reuters

Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Canada. Reuters

It is no fluke that this divine organisation of tellurian conscience-keepers has never lobbied for apartheid or mercantile critique of military-dominated Pakistan, a state good famous for carrying decimated eremite minorities – Hindus, Christians and Sikhs comparison – and promoted a many antagonistic policies opposite a diminutive non-Muslim minorities that have survived murders, abductions, tyranny, extortion, forced conversions and miss of full citizenship rights. The Pakistani state doesn’t even gangling Muslim sects like Ahmediyyas that are deliberate heretical by Sunni Muslims. At a time of partition, Hindus constituted over 28 percent of a race in a areas that became Pakistan. Today, Hindus consecrate about 1.8 percent of Pakistan’s race and 8.2 percent of Bangladesh’s. By contrast, a race of Muslims in India has grown from 9.8 percent in 1951 to 14.2 percent in a 2011 census. Yet, it is India and not Pakistan that is consistently targeted by these self-appointed guardians of domestic morality. These worthies have never mobilised universe opinion opposite Pakistan even though, in office of a everlasting feeling towards India, Pakistan has finished itself a root of tellurian terrorism. Why? Because Pakistan’s regimes have been bankrolled by a US and act as a puppets.

Would these academics brave petition unfamiliar governments to anathema a entrance of US presidents whose divergent domestic interventions have wrecked countless countries and caused mass slaughters in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria?

For a n’th time, they have lifted nonetheless again a assign that during Modi’s power 1,000 Muslims died in community riots. However, for once they got their sum rather tighten to reality. Earlier they wouldn’t stop during reduction than 3,000 Muslim deaths. But they deliberately destroy to discuss that a sum series of killings were as follows: 262 Hindus killed, possibly by Muslims or in police/army banishment on rebellious mobs, as opposite 863 Muslims finished to genocide by Hindus or in military firing. Riots have taken place in several states of India underneath non-BJP regimes. How is it that their heart bleeds usually for a victims of a 2002 riots? How come they have never distressed for a 58 Hindu men, women and children who were burnt alive in a sight manager during Godhra by a Muslim host – an occurrence that triggered off a retaliatory violence? Their harping on Modi’s complicity even after a Supreme Court of India found no justification opposite him, after subjecting Modi’s doing of a riots to heated inspection for 3 prolonged years, shows that their ground is not so noble.

Incidentally, a officers of a Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigative Team (SIT) that grilled Modi and his administration were handpicked with due capitulation of a veteran Modi-baiter, Teesta Setalvad. Yet Modi emerged unscathed. we would feel really absolved if these self-appointed guardians of Indian Muslims would caring to plea and plead my minute fact-sheet detailing day-by-day doing of a 2002 riots by Modi’s government, including his open statements. This has been published in my book Modi, Muslims and Media. (It is accessible on

I can usually interpretation by revelation a ‘Hate Modi’ Brigade, that a some-more undiscerning and antagonistic their rants opposite Modi, a some-more they strengthen open opinion in his defence. The powerful critique on amicable media opposite this petition have not all come from Modi admirers. Many of us who sealed a retort to a Silicon Valley petition (read here) are sincerely vicious of a stream functioning of a Modi government. And nonetheless we feel compelled to arise in his counterclaim given a ‘Hate Modi’ debate has pure ‘Hurt India’ overtones and encouraged by a enterprise to reinstall a scam-ridden regime that has been junked by Indian electorate for being dishonest and deleterious for a country.

Those who wish their critique to be taken severely have to acquire a right by being visibly non-partisan. This includes carrying a bravery to acknowledge a certain aspects and good deeds of a chairman targeted for scrutiny. There are as many critical lapses being committed by Modi supervision as there are attempts to urge things. But a petitioners’ blind influence is not gradual by reason or a existence check. Therefore, they are usually deleterious their possess certification and holding courtesy divided from vicious issues.

The author is a Professor during CSDS and owner of Manushi