U.S. Doesn’t Know How Many Foreign Visitors Overstay Visas

157 views Leave a comment
Photo
Alan Bersin, a partner secretary for general affairs during a Department of Homeland Security, during a House conference in Dec on a screening of visa field in a arise of militant attacks.

Credit
Zach Gibson/The New York Times

WASHINGTON — The doubt from a congressman to a Obama administration central was candid enough: How many unfamiliar visitors overstay their visas each year?

The respond was elementary too, though not in a gratifying way. “We don’t know,” a central said.

The irritable sell during a new congressional conference between Representative Mark Meadows, Republican of North Carolina, and Alan Bersin, a partner secretary for general affairs during a Department of Homeland Security, highlights what some law coercion officials call a vicious debility in a United States unfamiliar visa program.

The emanate has taken on combined coercion as partial of a broader hearing of immigration process following a mass shootings in San Bernardino, Calif., that left 14 people upheld and 22 wounded. Tashfeen Malik, one of a attackers, was postulated entrance to a United States underneath a K-1 visa, also famous as a fiancé visa. Her husband, Syed Rizwan Farook, was an American-born citizen. Both died in a shootout with a police. While Ms. Malik did not overstay her visa, a conflict combined to fears that a militant could feat gaps in a system.

Nearly 20 years ago, Congress upheld a law requiring a sovereign supervision to rise a complement to lane people who overstayed their visas. After a attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, an entrance and exit tracking complement was seen as a critical inhabitant certainty and counterterrorism tool, and a 9/11 Commission endorsed that a Department of Homeland Security finish a complement “as shortly as possible.” Two of a Sept. 11 hijackers, Satam al-Suqami and Nawaf al-Hazmi, had overstayed their visas.

Since then, a sovereign supervision has spent millions of dollars on a effort, nonetheless officials can usually roughly guess a series of people in a United States illegally after overstaying visas.

Officials censure a miss of record to control some-more modernized collection of information like iris scans, insurgency from a airline and tourism industries given of cost, and questions about a utility of tracking people exiting a nation as a counterterrorism measure.

Some experts also note that a large series of those who overstayed their visas are rarely learned workers who come underneath a H-1B module or are unfamiliar students.

One widely cited statistic, from a 1997 news by a Immigration and Naturalization Service, puts a series of people who overstay their visas during 40 percent — that now would meant about 4.4 million of a estimated 11 million undocumented residents in a United States. Numerous lawmakers, including a Republican presidential possibilities Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz, have used that figure when perplexing to news a range of a problem. But even that series has never been conclusively substantiated.

Federal agencies have not supposing a new news to Congress on overstays given 1994, notwithstanding a congressional mandate.

In early 2013, Janet Napolitano, afterwards a secretary of Homeland Security, testified before Congress that a organisation designed to emanate a news on overstay rates by Dec 2013. The organisation did not follow by given officials pronounced they did not have certainty in a peculiarity of a data. Mr. Bersin pronounced final month that a news would be released in a subsequent 6 months.

Many members of Congress and some law coercion officials worry that terrorists could feat a visa module given a United States does not customarily collect biometric information — fingerprints, iris scans and photographs that can be used for facial approval — of people withdrawal a country. Nearly 3 dozen countries, including many in Europe, Asia and Africa, collect such information.

“U.S. airports and other entrance and exit points were never designed with depart control in mind,” pronounced Theresa Cardinal Brown, a executive of Immigration Policy during a Bipartisan Policy Center in Washington and a Department of Homeland Security central underneath President George W. Bush. “If we wish to do that it’s going to meant building a lot some-more infrastructure.”

The 9/11 Commission news called a investiture of an entrance and exit biometric complement “fundamental to intercepting terrorists” perplexing to enter a United States given it would concede law coercion officials to establish if a traveler had overstayed a visa.

Still, efforts to build such a complement to collect a information have stalled for decades. In 2004, lawmakers upheld legislation that compulsory Homeland Security officials to accelerate efforts to emanate an programmed biometric entrance and exit information system. Congress steady a approach for a biometric exit complement in 2007 and set a deadline for 2009. But a deadline passed, with a dialect putting into place usually a handful of commander programs.

Since then, a dialect has continued to onslaught to accommodate this requirement. A 2013 news by a Government Accountability Office pronounced a Department of Homeland Security had some-more than one million “unmatched” attainment records, definition that those annals could not be checked opposite other information display that a people had left a country, though again a dialect could not offer a accurate number.

Despite a call by some lawmakers for an exit system, airports and a airline attention have balked given it would cost airlines $3 billion, according to a 2013 Homeland Security estimate. The dialect released regulations in 2008 requiring airports to collect biometric exit information, though carriers have mostly abandoned a regulation, and there have been no sanctions.

Some inhabitant certainty experts are not assured that a biometric complement would be an effective counterterrorism tool.

“A biometric exit complement does small to assistance stop those who destroy to register an exit — i.e., overstay their visas,” pronounced David Inserra, a process researcher on domestic certainty with a Heritage Foundation. “The complement merely tells officials that an overstay has occurred, not if it is a feign positive, a inhabitant certainty risk, or only an honest mistake.”

Mr. Inserra and other experts like Ms. Brown combined that Homeland Security did not have a resources to make existent immigration laws, let alone pursue all those who overstay their visas. The best approach to understanding with terrorism threats, they say, is to give some-more resources to comprehension agencies.

“The biometric exit complement is not going to solve all a problems,” Ms. Brown said. “All it will ever do is only beget a unequivocally costly list if there aren’t any additional resources allocated.”

The experts contend Homeland Security would be improved off regulating biographical information, such as a traveler’s name and date of birth, to lane exits and collect overstay data. But other experts contend names and identifications like passports and transport papers are frequency foolproof.

Groups like a Islamic State have used feign passports and aliases to bypass limit checkpoints and pierce from nation to country, Janice Kephart, former warn for a Senate Judiciary Committee and a staff member on a 9/11 Commission, pronounced final year in congressional testimony. She supposing lawmakers with Islamic State papers that speedy supporters to get feign credentials.

“Having accurate information on who is entrance and going — not who is sanctimonious to be entrance and going — is essential to curtailing a guileful and augmenting approach hazard that ISIS is aloud dogmatic during a homeland,” pronounced Ms. Kephart, who is now a arch executive of a Secure Identity and Biometrics Association, a trade group.