A minute to Kapil Dev: We adore Sachin Tendulkar for what he was, not what he could have been

262 views Leave a comment

Dear Kapil Paaji,

First things first. You are not a initial chairman to criticize Sachin Tendulkar. Over a years, all of us have listened people find faults with his batting. People have pronounced he played for personal milestones, that he slowed down when he was impending a landmark, that he finished centuries usually when India mislaid (which statistics have given shown to be not really accurate), that he could not finish off chases after removing set.

We could lay here and break numbers and uncover many of these criticisms are unfounded, though we substantially already know that.

But we sir, have brought adult a rather singular indicate currently – that he did not “justify his talent” and that “he could have finished many some-more than what he did.” we contingency give it to you, that’s a first. Not even a staunchest censor of Sachin could contend ‘Yaar, he did not make adequate runs.’

File print of Kapil Dev and Sachin Tendulkar. AFPFile print of Kapil Dev and Sachin Tendulkar. AFP

File print of Kapil Dev and Sachin Tendulkar. AFP

You have also left on to contend that Sachin usually knew how to make hundreds (a 100 of them in general cricket, if we recollect) and that he didn’t know how to make it a double hundred, or a triple or even 400s. He should have played some-more like Virender Sehwag and schooled how to be cruel from Sir Vivian Richards, we said.

Those statements seem a bit contradicting, if we trust these things called statistics. Of a dual players we wanted Sachin to bat like, Sehwag has a same series of Test double-hundreds (six) and ODI double hundred (one) as Sachin. Sehwag and Sachin are joint-top of a list of double-centurions in Tests for India.

Even Viv Richards, a good male that he is, was not a large fan of creation these daddy hundreds, with 3 in Tests and nothing in ODIs. Sachin, as it turns out, finished a 200 in a reduction than 50 overs before anyone else could in a story of cricket.

It’s a small peculiar that we picked on something that Sachin has finished utterly good with over his 24-year prolonged career.

Of course, Sehwag has dual triple hundreds some-more than Sachin, we will give we that. What Sehwag could do on a cricket margin to opponents, not many could. When he late recently, a comparisons to Viv Richards were utterly commonplace, and righteously so.

But it seems cross to wish Sachin to have finished better. In doing so, we have finished all of us consider behind to a days when a relatives responded to us scoring a 95 in arithmetic with ‘Hmmm, OK though where did a rest 5 outlines go, beta/beti?’ Not many of us enjoyed conference that. Even a unchanging counterclaim to such statements that they were usually perplexing to motivate us to do softened in life doesn’t reason H2O in this case. After all Sachin has already late and we am flattering certain we were not perplexing to egg him on to do good in a All Stars T20 matches subsequent month.

Also, Kapil Paaji, we are one of a many worshiped cricketers this republic has ever produced. In a republic that was famous for a stylish batsmen in CK Nayudu, Dileep Sardesai, Sunil Gavaskar and Gundappa Vishwanath and good spinners like Bishen Bedi, BS Chandrasekhar, S Venkatraghavan and Erapalli Prasanna, we were a initial bonafide discerning bowler who held a country’s imagination.

People precious you, for we were India’s usually answer to a quick bowlers of a Caribbean and a Sultans of Swing from Pakistan.

  • Sachin did not know how to make double hundred, or a triple or even 400s: Kapil Dev

    Sachin did not know how to make double hundred, or a triple or even 400s: Kapil Dev

  • Planned to retire in 2007 though Sachin stopped me: Virender Sehwag

    Planned to retire in 2007 though Sachin stopped me: Virender Sehwag

  • Virender Sehwag joins a Tendulkar-Warne cricket spectacular in a United States

    Virender Sehwag joins a Tendulkar-Warne cricket spectacular in a United States

You gave a republic her biggest sporting impulse of a century on that pleasing day in Lord’s in 1983. You pennyless down on live radio after MS Dhoni’s group reclaimed a World Cup 28 years since.

Given all that, I’m struggling to consider how it would make we feel had someone pronounced we should have aspired to be some-more harmful like Malcom Marshall or some-more cunning like Wasim Akram or Imran Khan. we can’t suppose your fans holding too good to comments like that.

Maybe we were observant this usually with a dark subtext of holding a taunt during a ‘Mumbai propagandize of cricket’ since of spats we had with your contemporaries from Mumbai. Or maybe we were observant all this usually to goblin a media and to get their knickers in a twist, which, we have successfully managed with your ‘beamer that boomeranged,’ like a news channel put it.

But as fans of a sport, we usually wish to tell we we adore a cricketing legends usually a approach they are. We don’t wish a Kapil Dev was some-more like Andy Roberts. We adore Sehwag and Sachin for a approach they anxious us on a cricket representation and carried a hopes of a cricket-crazy nation. We wouldn’t wish to barter them for improved, near-perfect variety of Sir Viv Richards and Sir Donald Bradman.


A fan of Sachin Tendulkar, Virender Sehwag and Kapil Dev

PS: Have we had a possibility to accommodate with Kumar Sangakkara’s father? You guys would strike it right off.