Beauty is as beauty does

156 views Leave a comment

Can a uninformed haircut or a hold of lipstick assistance a lady acquire some-more income in her career? According to a investigate by University of California, Irvine sociology alumna Jaclyn Wong and associate highbrow Andrew Penner, it can indeed.


Their commentary that couple a woman’s bathing habits – rather than inherited beauty – with her income were recently published in Research in Social Stratification Mobility. The study, creatively created as partial of Wong’s undergraduate honors thesis, was desirous by her mindfulness with gender inequality.

“I got unequivocally meddlesome in a thought of earthy lure since we was going into a work with a arrogance that lure seems to matter some-more for women than it does for men,” Wong says. “It felt like a large partial of amicable life that we weren’t articulate adequate about in an educational context.”

She and Penner used information from a National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Adult Health, a apparatus for amicable and behavioral scientists. It supposing justification of a long-known association between one’s lure and earnings: More appealing people reported aloft salaries.
“We knew that a Add Health information set also enclosed information about respondents’ bathing – their makeup, hair, clothing, etc.,” Wong says. “And we wondered: What is lure and what is grooming?”

The answer to that is still a bit fuzzy, though what they did find was that bathing explained a whole outcome of lure on income for women. In other words, women who put some-more bid into bathing done some-more money, regardless of such earthy attributes as good skin or a exquisite face. Men, on a other hand, while still rewarded for grooming, were also judged as appealing formed on biological traits. The information advise that women need to put in some-more work for a payoff.

“Once we comment for grooming, for women, lure doesn’t unequivocally matter anymore,” Penner says. “And that astounded me. Because typically when we consider about lure – most in a same approach that people consider about competition or gender – a thought is arrange of that we possibly have it or we don’t. You’re appealing or you’re not. But what we see is that for a labor marketplace return, what matters is not your inherited lure though rather how we benefaction yourself.”

Essentially, Wong says, a investigate suggested that women are compensated for adhering to widely supposed amicable norms. She finds this fascinating.

“It gives me another approach to consider of a mechanisms that are formulating gender inequality in a society,” she says. “It’s something that constantly sits in a behind of my mind as we do my other work: What’s opposite for women that competence not matter for men? What are some of a pressures women face that group don’t?”

Penner believes a materialisation they unclosed could be related to an overarching governmental enterprise to strive energy over a womanlike form.

“To my mind, it goes behind to a incomparable set of issues around how we arrange of find to control women’s bodies,” he says. “There was, we consider justifiably, some cheer in Britain recently per women being compulsory to wear high heels during work. we wish this investigate creates us doubt practices like this. we wish from a process viewpoint and also on an particular turn that it helps us be wakeful of these biases that we have and where they might or might not be warranted.”

Ideally, both say, a commentary will prompt people to simulate on a judgment of earthy beauty, what constitutes attractiveness, and because gender expectations differ.

Penner is mentoring a connoisseur tyro doing subject investigate on a subject – specifically, that professions prerogative some-more well-groomed women and that compensate some-more uniformly opposite a board, as good as a characteristics of these jobs, i.e., either they’re deliberate manly or feminine.

Wong, who is operative toward her Ph.D. in sociology during a University of Chicago, continues to investigate gender inequality in a labor market. Her stream concentration is dual-career couples and partner negotiations in propinquity to career moves.

“It’s unequivocally enlivening to me as a researcher that people find a things I’m doing critical in a same approach that we find them important,” she says. “Attractiveness seems to matter. So let’s figure out because and what accurately it is.”

Source: UC Irvine